🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," said one MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after viewing harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the state government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed measures mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain figures to copy this lead, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this international conversation continues, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that governments internationally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.