🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a flawed view of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas pose an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this argument is based on a serious misreading of the reality. The true challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Divide Separating Europe and the US

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, while a paltry 13.5% growth for the European Union. Over this time, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, about half of the world’s top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are European.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Question

The growing disparity is driven by superior productivity growth in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The scene of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into companies valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU positioned? Most analysts agree it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations starting at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of major factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true unified investment market, which caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper European business. A US startup can introduce a service under one set of laws to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population, is split among twenty-seven different national systems, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking differ sharply. In some EU nations, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has eroded its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these hurdles, one can find causes for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Notable reports on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses considerable advantages: high-quality workforce, excellent education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in developing next-generation tech, it can still dramatically increase productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.